It seems that after the recent site change, a beer's "hads" are included in the minimum number of reviews necessary to qualify a beer for the Top 100 - I believe 20 is the current minimum? I've been awfully critical of the "hads" overhaul but I think this change is the most concerning. Beers like BA Darkness and Kopi Luwak Aphrodite come to mind... I feel that 20 full reviews should be required for a beer to be qualified for the list, just like before. As it is, it seems as if 20 high ranking "hads" could put a beer on the Top 100 list. Maybe I'm missing something though? What do you guys think?