-
Stop lurking! Log in to search, post in our forums, review beers, see fewer ads, and more. — Todd, Founder of BeerAdvocate
Gold Medal Ale
Speight’s Ale House
- From:
- Speight’s Ale House
- New Zealand
- Style:
- English Pale Ale
Ranked #197 - ABV:
- 4%
- Score:
- 72
Ranked #27,811 - Avg:
- 2.74 | pDev: 24.09%
- Reviews:
- 9
- Ratings:
- Status:
- Active
- Rated:
- Jan 18, 2024
- Added:
- May 25, 2005
- Wants:
- 0
- Gots:
- 3
The legend begins here. In 1880 Speight’s enters it’s flagship ale into the Melbourne Exhibition. It cleans up, winning 2 gold medals and gets a new name; Gold Medal Ale is born.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Reviewed by Beginner2 from Illinois
3.3/5 rDev +20.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25
3.3/5 rDev +20.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.25
I do not understand the poor ratings on this ale.
While not distinctive in Taste (usually interpreted as needing abundant hops), Gold Medal Looked nice in the glass and Smelled mostly of malt. I found the Tastes balanced well for the food I had (a veggie burger) and it finished OK also. If I were drinking Gold Medal as a session, I might rate it lower... but I was having lunch and Gold Medal was good enough for a good experience. (I had Gold Medal as a flight of six at Speight's Greymouth restaurant.)
Jan 07, 2018While not distinctive in Taste (usually interpreted as needing abundant hops), Gold Medal Looked nice in the glass and Smelled mostly of malt. I found the Tastes balanced well for the food I had (a veggie burger) and it finished OK also. If I were drinking Gold Medal as a session, I might rate it lower... but I was having lunch and Gold Medal was good enough for a good experience. (I had Gold Medal as a flight of six at Speight's Greymouth restaurant.)
Reviewed by CrazyDavros from Australia
3.28/5 rDev +19.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5
3.28/5 rDev +19.7%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5
Pours amber/ruby with a creamy small head.
Nose isn't great. Shows some caramel and nutty notes, but quite dirty.
Flavours are very malty, loads of caramel and bready hints. Finishes with a mild bitterness.
Nice moderate carbonation, works surprisingly well with the richer flavours.
Apart from the aroma, pretty good!
Sep 16, 2010Nose isn't great. Shows some caramel and nutty notes, but quite dirty.
Flavours are very malty, loads of caramel and bready hints. Finishes with a mild bitterness.
Nice moderate carbonation, works surprisingly well with the richer flavours.
Apart from the aroma, pretty good!
Reviewed by StJamesGate from New York
3.31/5 rDev +20.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4
3.31/5 rDev +20.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4
Pours pale amber with stiff sticky white head. Offputtingly lager-like sweet corn nose with apple and maybe some light tea. Mulchy malts and ginger ale hops. Fizzy, light, slight cling.
Light and weak, barely enough ale flavors to recognize it as one. But still a easy summer drinker.
Only 7 reviews for one of NZ's most popular beers? Not a lot of kiwis on BA, I guess...
Sep 13, 2010Light and weak, barely enough ale flavors to recognize it as one. But still a easy summer drinker.
Only 7 reviews for one of NZ's most popular beers? Not a lot of kiwis on BA, I guess...
Reviewed by dgilks from Australia
3.23/5 rDev +17.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
3.23/5 rDev +17.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Pours a clear, bronzed gold colour with a small, short lasted white head. Decent lacing.
Light malty aroma ith a moderate metallic hop note. Not all that good but not awful.
The taste is disappointing. A sweet, slightly sticky malt flavour is not really balanced out by the small hop charge used. Still, it's pretty good for a macro.
Medium-light body and moderately-high carbonation are okay and help to make the beer refreshing if gassy.
Not the worst beer ever made but not all that great. Certainly it is brewed to mass market tastes but it has a malt character to it rather than just being watery.
Jul 10, 2010Light malty aroma ith a moderate metallic hop note. Not all that good but not awful.
The taste is disappointing. A sweet, slightly sticky malt flavour is not really balanced out by the small hop charge used. Still, it's pretty good for a macro.
Medium-light body and moderately-high carbonation are okay and help to make the beer refreshing if gassy.
Not the worst beer ever made but not all that great. Certainly it is brewed to mass market tastes but it has a malt character to it rather than just being watery.
Reviewed by Nickls from District of Columbia
3.13/5 rDev +14.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
3.13/5 rDev +14.2%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
(From notes)
A - Poured with a finger of pure white head, and was a clear coppery orange/brown color.
S - Biscuity/doughy, mild earthiness, touch of hops...but not much
T - Apple-like sourness; sweetish maltiness; tea; and earthy hop finish
M - Thinner to Medium MF, with muted carbonation and a little slick
D - Just OK drinking here, nothing insulting to the palate, but nothing interesting. Washed down a solid sandwich pretty well, but wouldn't go out of your way to obtain this.
Overall, just an OK brew and not a very good example of the style.
Apr 18, 2009A - Poured with a finger of pure white head, and was a clear coppery orange/brown color.
S - Biscuity/doughy, mild earthiness, touch of hops...but not much
T - Apple-like sourness; sweetish maltiness; tea; and earthy hop finish
M - Thinner to Medium MF, with muted carbonation and a little slick
D - Just OK drinking here, nothing insulting to the palate, but nothing interesting. Washed down a solid sandwich pretty well, but wouldn't go out of your way to obtain this.
Overall, just an OK brew and not a very good example of the style.
Reviewed by VitBAficionado from New Zealand (Aotearoa)
2.58/5 rDev -5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3
2.58/5 rDev -5.8%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2.5 | feel: 2 | overall: 3
A: Clear deep amber color with a small head and traces of lace. Light level of carbonation.
S: Caramel sweet with a kick of yeast at the back of the nose.
T: Just like it smells, overly sweet with the yeast coming through predominately in the aftertaste. Very small trace of spice at the beginning but disappears quickly.
M: Stringy and flat. Kind of like a low grade syrup. OK, maybe not that bad but you get the idea (maybe).
D: Basic lager beer. Wouldn't want to drink to0 many given the caramel notes but since it is essentially the New Zealand "bud" (and with the exchange rate actually cheaper) I guess you cannot be to picky.
Note: This improves quit a bit - especially in the taste and mouthfeel categories - when you get it as a "fresh" beer at the Speight's Ale House on Rattray St.
Feb 27, 2007S: Caramel sweet with a kick of yeast at the back of the nose.
T: Just like it smells, overly sweet with the yeast coming through predominately in the aftertaste. Very small trace of spice at the beginning but disappears quickly.
M: Stringy and flat. Kind of like a low grade syrup. OK, maybe not that bad but you get the idea (maybe).
D: Basic lager beer. Wouldn't want to drink to0 many given the caramel notes but since it is essentially the New Zealand "bud" (and with the exchange rate actually cheaper) I guess you cannot be to picky.
Note: This improves quit a bit - especially in the taste and mouthfeel categories - when you get it as a "fresh" beer at the Speight's Ale House on Rattray St.
Reviewed by mdagnew from Northern Ireland
3.08/5 rDev +12.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4
3.08/5 rDev +12.4%
look: 3 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 4
330ml Bottle bought from The Vineyard, Belfast...
Poured a golden orange / rust colour... White head disappeared almost instantly...
Aroma - Quite sweet, hints of orange, very light malt, slight sulphur notes, some spiciness, caramel...
Taste Quite sweet, nutty, slight saltiness, some lemon hints...
Feel - Quite smooth - low carbonation..
Overall - A very average beer.... although quite drinkable....
Dec 12, 2005Poured a golden orange / rust colour... White head disappeared almost instantly...
Aroma - Quite sweet, hints of orange, very light malt, slight sulphur notes, some spiciness, caramel...
Taste Quite sweet, nutty, slight saltiness, some lemon hints...
Feel - Quite smooth - low carbonation..
Overall - A very average beer.... although quite drinkable....
Reviewed by lacqueredmouse from Australia
2.87/5 rDev +4.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
2.87/5 rDev +4.7%
look: 2.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 2.5
Tried at the brewery late Oct 2005.
Appearance is deceiving, looks like it could be a good pale ale. Nice orange-amber colour, minimal head.
Smell is predominantly sweetness, almost a bit caramelly, but with a heavy whack of yeast. It's alright, but certainly nothing spectacular.
Taste is pretty much the same; a reasonably standard yeasty ale flavour. More sweetness than a generic lager, but predominantly flat and simple. In actual fact, it was far better than I expected it would be, it was remarkably drinkable, but it didn't have a great deal going for it.
Nov 14, 2005Appearance is deceiving, looks like it could be a good pale ale. Nice orange-amber colour, minimal head.
Smell is predominantly sweetness, almost a bit caramelly, but with a heavy whack of yeast. It's alright, but certainly nothing spectacular.
Taste is pretty much the same; a reasonably standard yeasty ale flavour. More sweetness than a generic lager, but predominantly flat and simple. In actual fact, it was far better than I expected it would be, it was remarkably drinkable, but it didn't have a great deal going for it.
Reviewed by IronDjinn from Canada (AB)
2.01/5 rDev -26.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2
2.01/5 rDev -26.6%
look: 3 | smell: 2 | taste: 2 | feel: 1.5 | overall: 2
Quite the shocker to find some New Zealand beers on the shelves here in Alberta these days. This one apparently won a gold medal at the Melbourne International Brewing Awards over 100 years ago (or so the blurb on the back label states), hence the name of the beer. Came in a 6 pack, short brown 330 ml stubbie bottles, blue and orange label.
Pours out a clear but watery looking light copper, quick splash of head that fades quickly. The aroma is thin with light bouts of thin malt and only the faintest traces of a hop. The taste is weak and held up more by the intense carbonation of the mouthfeel than a semblence of flavour. The flavour itself fades in and out between weak malt extract and the unmistakable sodium laced flavour of soda water--no fooling! It's mildly quenching, but truly lacks any substance to hold itself up, and I would loosely refer to this as a beer at best. Won't be picking up any more of these, I can get just as bad domestically at far less the cost.
May 25, 2005Pours out a clear but watery looking light copper, quick splash of head that fades quickly. The aroma is thin with light bouts of thin malt and only the faintest traces of a hop. The taste is weak and held up more by the intense carbonation of the mouthfeel than a semblence of flavour. The flavour itself fades in and out between weak malt extract and the unmistakable sodium laced flavour of soda water--no fooling! It's mildly quenching, but truly lacks any substance to hold itself up, and I would loosely refer to this as a beer at best. Won't be picking up any more of these, I can get just as bad domestically at far less the cost.
Gold Medal Ale from Speight’s Ale House
Beer rating:
72 out of
100 with
19 ratings
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!