Log in or Sign up
Monk's Café Flemish Sour Ale
- Brouwerij Van Steenberge N.V.
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Tweet
BA SCORE
87
very good
-
1,637 Ratings
THE BROS
N/A
-
send 'em beer »
rAvg: 3.85
pDev: 14.29%
Reviews: 971
Hads: 666
Ratings Help
Brewed by:
Brouwerij Van Steenberge N.V.
Belgium
Style | ABV
Flanders Oud Bruin
| 5.50%
ABV
Availability:
Year-round.
bottle (859)
,
on-tap (110)
,
cask (2)
.
Notes:
Brewed for Monk's Café in Philadelphia, but also available for retail purchase elsewhere. Oud Bruin in style; a traditional blend of young and old beers.
View:
Beers
(68) |
Events
(0)
Reviews
Sort by:
Latest
|
High
|
Low
|
Top Reviewers
| Show Hads:
« first
‹ prev
|
801-825
|
826-850
|
851-875
|
876-900
|
901-925
|
next ›
last »
Higravity
Michigan
3.35
/5
rDev
-13%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
A nice solid sour, but kind of a low end attempt. The apperance was Redish and I got a little head. Smells of feet and lactic acid covering up all of the malt. The taste is sour but not overly sour and is kind of one dimentional with the malt backbone most broken. It was also pretty thin and watery, but it could be a nice sipper at a lower price, but I think I would rather go to better Sour ales.
Serving type: bottle
02-10-2006 19:06:25 |
More by Higravity
IBUnit63
Massachusetts
3.35
/5
rDev
-13%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 2.5
Bready, rye bread head with Florentine lacing. Deep, dark brown body with moderate carbonation. Has a root beer look to it.
This is an unfamiliar style for me, so I'm getting a lot of vinegar at first. Sweet, sarsparilla malt also makes an apperance. Ample funk.
I can understand the sour vinegar funk but I'm getting a tinny, metallic taste also. Comes off as funky but not entirely in a good way. Underneath the metal there's lots of character, though.
Yeasty, bready mouthfeel - funk evens out with warmth.
This one is a little tough to choke down - decently made but probably not my thing.
Serving type: bottle
06-21-2008 13:03:08 |
More by IBUnit63
pastradul
California
3.35
/5
rDev
-13%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5
poured into a lost continent tulip.
poures a deep ruby with a slightly pink head with lots of bubbles riding the glass.
The smell is all viniger, some sweetness fighting through but mainly tart viniger.
the taste starts of with a good amount of sweetness. Lots of cherry or maybe even strawberry would be the closest fruit flavor that would fit. Then a very tart acidic flavor kicks you in the mouth. then finishes with a dry warmth around the mouth.
a pretty good beer. after a couple of sips it grows on you a bit.
Serving type: bottle
06-05-2010 04:46:09 |
More by pastradul
weatherdog
Illinois
3.35
/5
rDev
-13%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
Revisited in May of 2010.
Many of my previous notes still hold up except that now that I've had many more examples of the style, my favorite, I can understand how mainstream this example is. The sweetness and lack of acetic character stand out when had side by side with a great example. While I still enjoy this beer and applaud it's availability and affordability, I had to lower the score down a little bit in order to have it more accurately reflect it's rank among other Oud Bruins
Poured from a 330mL bottle into a Delirium tulip glass
Poured a ruby red brown with a one finger head which receded into a small ring of bubbles around the edge of the glass
Aroma is of a tart sweetness and ripe fruit. Not offensive in smell but enough to know the style one is about to drink
Taste starts off with a decent amount of funk that transitions into a ripe fruit tartness. Finishes dry without much residual sweetness.
Carbonation is on the higher side and coupled with the tart dryness the drinkability is diminished and one bottle is perfect.
I'm just beginning to dive into the world of sours. It really is great trip and I enjoyed this easily accessible one. The more pronounced tartness and less residual sweetness of this example I prefer over some of the sweeter finishing ones.
Serving type: bottle
06-08-2010 06:38:57 |
More by weatherdog
rwinzing
New Jersey
3.35
/5
rDev
-13%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
Poured from a 11.5 oz bottle into a pint glass.
A-Dark Red appearance with a tan head.
S - Subtle spice smell, as a hint of apple with the tinge of being sour
T - Hint of sour green apple up front followed by sour after taste. The sour lingers
M - Nice mouthfeel full bodied
D - I enjoy sours and find this one a affortable option
overall this is a sour I can buy by the four pack and enjoy on a regular basis. I think it is a nice example of the style without being a homerun
Serving type: bottle
08-16-2010 23:21:00 |
More by rwinzing
Oxymoron
Colorado
3.33
/5
rDev
-13.5%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Thanks to koopa for the trade. Pours a crystal clear amber red color. A fizzy white head but did settle to a more creamy appearance over time. Good retention though did hide to the edge of the glass.
The nose has a distinct sweet and sour aroma. The sourness is not over the top but still noticeable. There is a light vinegar and sour but no real funk. The sweetness comes in with a light fruity aroma on the back end. Some cherries and touch of apples (but not something I would call acetaldehyde) as well.
The taste is very similar. The sourness backs off a bit and has more of a tart flavor. Still provides a puckering sourness just light overall. This helps emphasis the more fruity aspect. Noticeable cherries and sugar plums. Some candy flavors as well. There is a hint of caramel with a light toast note but feint. The yeast is pretty clean for a sour. Some minor barnyard, but mostly clean.
The body is not as dry for a typical sour. Really easy drinking though. Overall it reminds me of Duchesse but toned down.
Serving type: bottle
10-20-2008 17:22:44 |
More by Oxymoron
abuliarose
New Hampshire
3.33
/5
rDev
-13.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
Poured into a tulip glass, revealing a decent but fading head over copper-toned body with fair bubble action. The second pour, to top the glass off, left a much thicker head that slides slowly down the inner glass and has quite nice staying power. It's a pretty looking beer. Smells quite metallic with lots of grape aromas, white and cider vinegar and something else decidedly off-putting. If this were any other type of beer, I would be tossing it, but the smells are pretty on for an oud bruin as far as I can tell.
Tastes very sweet and even a little salty with some unami soy sauce-type flavor. I don't get sour in a pucker sense at all except maybe at the end. Most of the sourness is the acidity I associate with carbonation. Mouthfeel is very airy and carbonated with much tingling. Pretty smooth body, light to near medium weight. Lots of sour-type off-malt character at the end. Fairly warming.
Overall, a decent representation of its style. If I could change it, I'd wish it a bit more sour.
Serving type: bottle
01-09-2010 03:19:38 |
More by abuliarose
angrybabboon
Rhode Island
3.33
/5
rDev
-13.5%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Review adapted from notes taken 5/18/10
Appearance: Reddish brown color with a nice foamy, fluffy head - nice to look at
Smell: Sweet, sugary, funky, lactic, some malts in the background - I should note that these notes are from my second tasting - this was my first sour beer, and when I first smelled it I thought the beer smelled like a soggy sponge that someone abandoned for a few days - not kidding - thankfully, it was better the second time
Taste: More sweet than funky or sour - some sour cherry, but mostly the taste is dominated by the sweetness - gets a bit funkier as it warms up - some interesting herbal spiciness, and some wood - but the sweetness never fades, and it is somewhat overwhelming - not terrible, but certainly not something I really enjoy
Mouthfeel: Slightly above average for a sour, some nice carbonation, on the heavy side
Overall: Way too sweet for me to be interested in trying again soon - but it is something I will probably try again in the future
As I've already noted in my "smell" section, I have a strange history with Monk's Cafe. It was my first sour beer, and I didn't really like it at the time. After my first taste, I tried a few other sour beers. Then when I had Monk's Cafe again, I still didn't love it, but I had more specific reasons for not embracing its qualities. This beer is worth a try, but it's certainly not spectacular.
Serving type: bottle
03-09-2011 08:05:33 |
More by angrybabboon
dar482
New York
3.31
/5
rDev
-14%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
I had this on tap in Brooklyn at DBA.
The color is dark brown red with some amber on the edges.
The aroma has a sour cherry nose with some funk.
The flavor has a wonderful vinegar sour tart. It starts first is a bit of sour. Then it turns into a candied cherry. It finishes with a fake sweetness, almost like Sweet n’ Low or something.
This is a good beginner’s sour. It isn’t very sour, there isn’t much funk, and there is tons of sweetness on the end. It has a light body. It’s quite drinkable, but nothing too exciting.
Serving type: on-tap
06-06-2013 20:19:54 |
More by dar482
Beerdster
Alaska
3.31
/5
rDev
-14%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 3.25
Poured into a tulip.
A: Pretty opaque, dark red almost to the point of being brown. Dense white/tan head dissipated quickly.
S: Smells great: fruity, cherry, rounded
Taste: Sourness up front, but not very tart, it quickly gives way to...not much, really. Pretty weak finish.
M: In a word: thin. In more than one word: Thin, with carbonation that's a bit flacid.
The smell and appearance of this one set me up for a bit of a letdown. Almost no flavor on the back end, weak finish and little to no body. Probably a good "starter" sour.
Serving type: bottle
06-09-2013 16:22:40 |
More by Beerdster
illidurit
California
3.3
/5
rDev
-14.3%
look: 3 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
Clear rust color with an ecru head that's fizzy but is kept alive by an etching at the bottom of my goblet. Black cherry aroma with some brown sugar and vinegar. Flavor is sweet with cherry and apple juice, a touch of vinaigrette, and some caramel. Not very sour really, and barely even tart. Definitely more sweet than anything. Body is very light, bordering on thin. Astringent dryness and a little metallic character. Overcarbonated.
Serving type: bottle
03-14-2009 00:52:34 |
More by illidurit
codewarrior
New York
3.3
/5
rDev
-14.3%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
330mL from a 4 pack (17FJ 16:07), poured into a chalice
This beer, once upon a time, was my first sour ale ... on tap at Monk's cafe in Philadelphia a little-ways back. When I saw it sitting at Argonaut on Colfax, I jumped on it ... twittering with anticipation and chirping about it to my sweet lady.
A: Looks like mud mixed with blood (this is a good thing). Small amount of head, but thick.
S: Smells sticky and damp, like a frat-house basement ... except in a good-way.
T: Sweet up front, iron in the back. Very similar to the New Glarus Unplugged Enigma. Very.
F: Great! Thick and syrupy, but not over-much.
D: Nice all around.
Gonna let this do a turn in the cellar, see if it grows into itself a bit more. This is a delicious beer (vastly superior to the duchesse, to be sure), yet it doesn't stand up to other sours (Panil Bariqquee, Russian River Consecration, Supplication, etc). Yet. I have faith that in time, this baby will mature into a force to be reckoned with.
None-the-less ... friggin' tasty, seriously.
Serving type: bottle
09-25-2010 01:14:09 |
More by codewarrior
sweemzander
Illinois
3.3
/5
rDev
-14.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
11.2oz bottle poured into a stemmed glass.
(A)- Pours a deep and dark burnt sienna color with ruby red highlights. Produced a nice fluffy off-white head with solid retention.
(S)- A big dry lactic vinegar up front. Some serious barnyard dirt and vinegar characters.
(T)- Very fruity. Not as sour or vinegar-like as the smell foretold. Some hints at tartness, but otherwise fruity, dry, and earthy with just a small kick.
(M)- A nice crisp carbonation level. Has a nice balance too. Smooth, fruity, and "ripe" tasting. A subtle sourness.
(D)- A solid Oud Bruin. Not as strong as what I anticipated, but it is what it is. Surprisingly refreshing and a nice treat and transition to have as the days slowly begin to warm up outside.
Serving type: bottle
04-01-2011 00:58:04 |
More by sweemzander
Aml42000
Washington
3.3
/5
rDev
-14.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
A- Dark brown body with a fluffy tan head. It showed some transparency toward the bottom of the glass and maintains a pretty appearance throughout.
S- A powerful blast of balsamico is hard to shake as you stick your nose deeper in the glass, but some muddled pit fruit becomes apparent with some swirling and persistence.
T- A healthy tension of sweet and sour on entry. The tart components are certainly more prominent on the mid palate. Tart, slighly underripe cherry and rhubarb fill the mouth. The barrel and yeast components take a backseat to the fruity aspects here. Medium levels of acidity for a sour ale.
M- This is a bit linear for a sour. High carbonation makes it more like a tart fruit soda than a sour or wild ale. I like a bit more acidity as I prefer a drier, fresher mouthfeel than this offers.
O- A very safe sour ale for those who aren't familiar with the style. A very versatile beer to serve with food as it has enough flavor to pair with many types of dishes, but gets a little tiresome to sip on alone. I wish it showed some more wild aspects.
Serving type: bottle
07-07-2012 21:31:52 |
More by Aml42000
mrasskicktastic
New Jersey
3.28
/5
rDev
-14.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
A - Auburn reddish with a medium tan head with lots of lacing. High carbonation is visible.
S - Very sour cherries, apple cider vinegar, faint cherry wood? That is unexpected.
T - Underripe sour cherries and mild vinegar. A bit of faint malt. Aftertaste is a sour and vinegary.
M - Thin, smooth, a little astringent, substantial carbonation. A tad refreshing too.
D - Pretty good. Not the best Flemish sour, but worth a try.
Serving type: bottle
09-21-2007 06:31:43 |
More by mrasskicktastic
ShogoKawada
Rhode Island
3.28
/5
rDev
-14.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Bought on impulse at the store. Poured 12oz into pint.
A- brown with an amazing head. This is some thick stuff. Looks tasty.
S- Cinnamon jumps off the pint, as well as clove spices. Smells like potpourri, honestly. A bit of fleshy fruit.
T- Sour hits the tongue. Wow. This one throws me for a loop. Spicy, sweet, sour. Good, unique, strange. I didn't know what to expect, but this wasn't it. Hmm. Second sip is sweeter, less sour. Clove aftertaste. Gets a little too sweet for my tastes, however.
M- Unique. The sweet and sour play on the tongue.
D- Eh... I'm impressed by this beer. I didn't like it enough to buy some more, but I respect the craft put into this unique brew. A very off-the-beaten-path brew that's worth checking out.
Serving type: bottle
06-18-2009 04:51:53 |
More by ShogoKawada
PeterLemonjello
Alabama
3.28
/5
rDev
-14.8%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 4 | overall: 3
A - Very pretty beer. Pours a dark/rusty ruby color. Clear with nice carbonation. Thin head which remains during drinking. Nice lacing on glass.
S - Smells of sweet fruit with a touch of sour cider. Ever so slight touch of barnyard.
T - Tastes nice but a little sweet. Tastes of sweet cherries with a sour flavor present but just not enough to balance out the sweetness. I want to enjoy it more as it tastes very nice, but the sweetness just needs to be balances out with more sour or more barnyard which just isn't there enough to balance.
M - Lovely mouthfeel with prickly carbonation. Not too think and not too think.
D - Tough for me rank higher on drinkability because of the sweetness. If more balanced or a drier finish, it would be a very good beer.
Serving type: bottle
01-04-2010 02:56:09 |
More by PeterLemonjello
dejrrma
Georgia
3.28
/5
rDev
-14.8%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
4 pack for about $14. 11.2 fl oz bottle poured into snifter. No date (that I could understand)
a- pours a deep amber, large off-white, froathy, buttery head that slides as i move the glass. a little lacing composed of foamy bubbles.
s- vinegary scent with notes of dark/red fruits (prunes, cranberries, raspberries). A hidden sweet aroma.
t- tastes like tart fresh fruits and balsamic vinaigrette. It's more sour than sweet, as I'd hoped, and but I wish it was more sour. Leaves a lingering earthy/metallic taste. Slight yeast
m- okay carbonation. Light and airy, and refreshing. A little watery as it warms .
o- Good, but not sure if I would buy again.
Serving type: bottle
12-25-2011 21:00:36 |
More by dejrrma
DavidST
Texas
3.28
/5
rDev
-14.8%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
Poured from a 33cl bottle into a pint glass, coded bottle date. This pours a crystal clear amber color with a massive fizzy tan head which last for a very long time a leave a duvel like foam. The smell is a little brown ale malty, a little nutty, hints of cherries. The feel is medium to light. The taste is okay, you get a little bitterness, nutty brown ale flavors and a little sourness, but mostly plain and light, this beer has the unfornutate task of following Liefmans Curvee and it leaves a ton to be desired.
Serving type: bottle
12-25-2012 06:07:19 |
More by DavidST
Pamola
Vermont
3.25
/5
rDev
-15.6%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
I had tried this on tap before and wasn't too impressed. It may have been due to its comparison to the other fine brews in a flight at a beer bar, but here goes.
Poured an unaged bottle into a tulip glass. nice two finger head. The color is quite impressive. seems brown but in certain light it's very ruby-colored.
Smell is very reminiscent of Rodenbach's type or sour. Not piercing, but earthy and twangy and pretty good.
Taste is where this brew stumbles. This is an unaged bottle, so I'll reserve the ultimate judgement for a few years from now when another bottle comes out of the cellar. The sourness isn't quite sourness, it's a light tartness one would expect from fresh cider. Overwhelmingly fruity and slightly cloying.
Mouthfeel is jumbled and too effervescent.
Serving type: bottle
01-18-2009 23:14:00 |
More by Pamola
OneDropSoup
Pennsylvania
3.25
/5
rDev
-15.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Grabbed this bottle from House of 1000 Beers in New Kensington, PA.
Poured into a stemmed tulip: Deep crimson body with ruby highlights - beautiful color. A finger of smooth, pillowy head that drops to a thin coating & coating. No lacing.
Tart cherry & orange peel in the smell with an overlying medicinal character, kind of like zinc lozenges. Somewhat metallic - good stuff in there, but those off-smells are hard to sift through.
Taste has pretty much the same notes as the smell, but the pleasant/unpleasant ratio has flipped to the point that the good outweighs the bad here by a little - the medicinal/metallic flavors are just trace.
Tart & acidic mouthfeel, medium-bodied, with just a little chalky sensation. As in the taste, the good's good & the bad's tolerable.
Definitely not my favorite for the style, but doable. I can stick with just one, though.
Serving type: bottle
12-24-2010 01:02:37 |
More by OneDropSoup
OddNotion
New Jersey
3.25
/5
rDev
-15.6%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
11.2 oz bottle poured into my Russian River Belgian style glass.
Appearance: Pours a deep, yet semi transparent, reddish brown with a two finger light tan head that dissipates relatively quickly down to a cap on the beer with nice lacing.
Smell: Funkiness that turns medicinal, sour cherry alongside some bitter fruity scent. A little too reminiscent of robitussin, which gives me flashbacks of childhood and how much I hated that damn syrup, ergo its making it hard for me to want to take that first sip.
Taste: I let this beer sit until it warmed up from the fridge temp and I still get some metallic flavors. It is sweet, not sour at all, not even tart. I get some dark fruits such as figs, raisins, and even some molasses at the end.
Mouthfeel: Extremely light bodied and thin.
Overall: I guess its not bad for a beginner on the style. I am by no means a seasoned pro with sours, but this one just doesnt do much for me. It is not repulsive, but then again it gives me no reason to desire another one.
Serving type: bottle
05-12-2011 00:50:17 |
More by OddNotion
Arithmeticus
Maryland
3.25
/5
rDev
-15.6%
look: 4.5 | smell: 2 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
Poured chilled in flared sample glass @davewhite4, the third of a sour beer trilogy.
A: thin head, but very active carbonation; cola color; snowglobe effect from all the yeast floating about
S: not much aroma; opens up into some vinegar
T: very flavorful; sour cherry dominates; good malt presence
Good specimen of a sour beer
Serving type: bottle
05-19-2013 22:29:00 |
More by Arithmeticus
Zorro
California
3.23
/5
rDev
-16.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5
Pours a slightly cloudy reddish brown ale with out much of a head.
Smell is sweet and fruity with a slight acid edge. Mostly fruit scents of sour cherries with a sweetening of honey. Later one softer scents of brown sugar and rum appear.
Taste is a little sweet with a good sour pop of acid to more or less even the flavor out and leaves a lemony sour note on your tongue. Fruit flavor of sour cherries without going too sour. Refreshing but not real complex.
Mouthfeel is OK.
OK as the style goes. A sweet and sour ale that I really can't pair with anything except Sauerbraten.
Serving type: bottle
11-11-2005 05:22:46 |
More by Zorro
jbschafer
Iowa
3.23
/5
rDev
-16.1%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
Poured from a bottle into a snifter. Served at the high end of cellar temperature.
Pours a hazy amber, brown color - even more hazy than I might expect from this style. Very limited amount of light let through to the point of looking like something is "not right." I do not detect any red as might be expected. Reasonable sized head, collapses down in about a mind. Nice mild lacing as you drink that saved it's appearance score.
Smell is a mixture of sour fruit and some kind of bathroom astringent. Not awful, but again, like something is not right.
By the time, I took my first drink, I was already wondering what I had gotten myself into. The first taste was a mixture of cloves and vinegar, and like several other reviewers, I thought - crud, a lousy beer. However, I never trust first impressions. The clove taste was gone by the third sip and replaced with something more like sharp rotten fruit (kiwi?). While that sounds awful, it isn't too bad, and it began to grow on me.
Mouthfeel is somewhat thin with a lingering flavor of wet beach sand and, again, sour kiwi.
I could drink one with a meal, but am not sure I would want to drink two or three sitting around with friends.
I am not sorry I tried this, but it doesn't hold up against several of it's peers (like an old lover, Duchesse was my first and remains my favorite). I will probably keep a bottle on hand in the cellar, but it won't be one I will reach for on a weekly basis.
Serving type: bottle
02-18-2006 18:55:11 |
More by jbschafer
« first
‹ prev
|
801-825
|
826-850
|
851-875
|
876-900
|
901-925
|
next ›
last »
Monk's Café Flemish Sour Ale from Brouwerij Van Steenberge N.V.
87
out of
100
based on
1,637
user ratings.
Home
Forums
Beers
Add Beer
Top 250 Beers
Beer Styles
Beer 101
Respect Beer
Places
Events
Magazine
Log in
Beer
Place
Event
Forum