1881 - Ruhstaller

18811881

Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
BA SCORE
85
very good
-
33 Ratings
THE BROS
N/A

-
send 'em beer »
rAvg: 3.8
pDev: 10%
Reviews: 14
Hads: 19

Ratings Help


Brewed by:
Ruhstaller visit their website
California, United States

Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale |  5.60% ABV

Availability: Rotating. bottle (9), can (4), on-tap (1)

Notes:
No notes at this time.
View:  Beers  (7) |  Events  (0)

Reviews

Sort by:  Latest | High | Low | Top Reviewers  | Show Hads:
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
Reviews by XicanoBeerRun:
Photo of XicanoBeerRun
XicanoBeerRun

Texas

3.75/5  rDev -1.3%

06-11-2012 00:13:00 | More by XicanoBeerRun
More User Reviews:
Photo of beepill
beepill

California

3.91/5  rDev +2.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Poured out of a beautifully simple 22 oz bottle purchased 1 hour ago. Never heard of Ruhstaller before, but the bottle stood out in the chiller because it is very simple and is draped by rustic-looking burlap. Great marketing. Also the bottle says "Sacramento", "Lake County", and "Farm to Pint", which also made me want to try it, being that it is pretty local and it seems like all the ingredients listed are also Cali-grown.

A - Pours a dark reddish brown with a nice 1" head of white foam that creates a nice barrier. Nice lacing of foam while I let it "settle".

S - Very faint smell of grains and grass. Very, very faint. I keep sniffing, trying to smell something, but maybe its just me.

T - Very refreshing. Very well-balanced malt and hops. This is what a true red ale should taste like (I am thinking this while drinking it). Slight piney bitterness at the finish. Flavors more apparent as it warms to room temp.

M - Moderate carbonation at first. Light to moderate body that goes down smooth. Great for a warm day in Cali.

O - The flavors are well balanced and not overdone. I am glad I made this random purchase today. I will seek out Ruhstaller brews in the future. A great representation of an American red ale, and the fact that they use 100% California products in their beer only makes me want to support them more.

P.S. - Ruhstaller - I want more of this stuff in the Bay!

Serving type: bottle

06-09-2013 20:29:37 | More by beepill
Photo of dertyd
dertyd

California

4/5  rDev +5.3%

05-05-2013 01:28:31 | More by dertyd
Photo of marct
marct

Nevada

3.5/5  rDev -7.9%

05-04-2013 16:14:50 | More by marct
Photo of GraduatedCashew
GraduatedCashew

California

3.75/5  rDev -1.3%

04-26-2013 15:22:41 | More by GraduatedCashew
Photo of dwagner003
dwagner003

California

3.5/5  rDev -7.9%

04-22-2013 15:51:11 | More by dwagner003
Photo of Fatehunter
Fatehunter

Oregon

3.53/5  rDev -7.1%
look: 5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.25

Poured two fingers of tight, foamy head on a deep red colored body.
The aroma is a rich malt/barnyard smell. One-side but nice.
The taste is bold: lots of malt sweetness with a dose of lemon bitterness to balance it out. The maltiness still comes out ahead in the end.
The texture is thicker with moderate carbonation.
A big malty red ale, enjoyable.

Serving type: can

04-10-2013 02:15:36 | More by Fatehunter
Photo of PHBoiler
PHBoiler

Illinois

3.83/5  rDev +0.8%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

22 oz bomber poured into Sam Adams perfect pint

Deep amber color that delivers exactly as expected with a huge cream colored head regardless of type of pour.

The scent is fairly basic, but the hops do come through. The beer is very balanced and standard, well crafted red. This style can go all over the board, but this is a very true version. The local products utilized and noted on the bottle are a nice touch.

Serving type: bottle

03-30-2013 05:22:31 | More by PHBoiler
Photo of TheSixthRing
TheSixthRing

California

3.34/5  rDev -12.1%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

Appearance - Pours a relatively clear, orange rust color with an off-white, half finger head and sub-par retention.

Smell - Not getting much. Slight bread. Touch of citrus.

Taste - Malts are bready, lightly toasted, with a drop of caramel. Mild grapefruit pith comes on near and into the finish.

Mouthfeel - Medium in body with low to fair carbonation. Smooth. Goes down easy.

Overall - Not a particularly impressive red, especially considering the price. Shows good balance, but the flavors don't excite the palate quite like they should. Quaffable, but kind of boring. This is the first time I've seen this beer in cans. It came out fairly flat... maybe they've got some kinks to work out?

Serving type: can

03-27-2013 06:15:30 | More by TheSixthRing
Photo of Beerswag
Beerswag

California

3.75/5  rDev -1.3%

02-21-2013 21:42:59 | More by Beerswag
Photo of elNopalero
elNopalero

Texas

3.8/5  rDev 0%
look: 4.5 | smell: 4 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Update:
This was the red ale, although its tan-amber coloring made me think at first glance it was a malty IPA. It certainly has a mellow hop aroma more akin to an IPA whose hops have faded than a fresh red ale. There’s some caramel sweetness rounding out the flavor and a bit of a piney character to it as well.

Previously:
Thanks to XicanoBeerRun for this one. First time I’ve even heard of this brewery.

This pours a dark caramel-amber color, with light foam.
This has a piney, malty ‘red ale’ aroma—not too hoppy, not overly malty. Tasty too, a real easy sipper. It’s not as full flavored as the aroma would indicate. There’s a touch of piney hops, some light resin and a nice bittering to it which comes out midpoint.. Well-rounded and nicely balanced. I enjoyed it.

Serving type: bottle

02-21-2013 07:01:37 | More by elNopalero
Photo of TGS
TGS

California

4/5  rDev +5.3%

02-15-2013 04:14:57 | More by TGS
Photo of CN1234
CN1234


4/5  rDev +5.3%

02-10-2013 18:02:19 | More by CN1234
Photo of Bnoise11
Bnoise11

California

4.25/5  rDev +11.8%

02-02-2013 16:42:40 | More by Bnoise11
Photo of jb413
jb413

Massachusetts

3.65/5  rDev -3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.75 | overall: 3.75

A - Great color, cloudy fruit punch with small head and a bit of lacing. Iced tea around the edges and when held in the light.

S - Medium hop-first nose, a bit of alcohol, and some light bready malt

T - Fairly good hoppy profile, with a bit of caramel/malty towards the end. Hops are a mix of piney, floral and some fruit on the end. Not quite one-dimensional but also not stellar.

MF - Light-medium body and nice finish. Wet-hop in the mouth.

O - A straight shooter. Decent hoppy red that's enjoyable but nearly forgettable.

Serving type: bottle

01-19-2013 02:30:51 | More by jb413
Photo of kojevergas
kojevergas

California

3.08/5  rDev -18.9%
look: 3 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25

1 pint 6 oz brown glass bottle with straw covered neck and standard pressure cap acquired at the Cap N Cork Junior Market in Los Feliz for $8.99 USD and served into a Uinta pilsner glass in me gaff in Los Feliz. Reviewed live. This is me first beer from this brewery. Expectations are average. I like the straw neck; it's a nice rustic touch - even if it is a gimmick.

Served straight from the fridge. Side-poured with standard vigor as no carbonation issues are anticipated.

A: Pours a 1.5 finger beige colour head of fairly good cream, nice thickness, and above average retention. Body colour is a clear translucent textbook copper. No yeast particles are visible. No bubble show. No lacing as the head recedes. Typical of the style; this is standard fare.

Sm: Toasted malt, floral hops, and malty sweetness. Very simple. An average strength aroma. No yeast character or alcohol is detectable.

T: Amber malts and accompanying sweetness, and floral hops. Some caramelized malt. Clean and pleasant, but incredibly simple. Lacks complexity and subtlety. I like it in a general sense. No yeast character or alcohol comes through.

Mf: Smooth and wet. Good carbonation. Decent thickness. Fair palate presence. Suits the flavour profile in a general sense.

Dr: Drinkable but forgettable. Very pedestrian. Priced very highly for its mundane quality. $8.99 for this? I wouldn't get this again. I'm glad the bottles are distinctive because it will be easy to avoid buying more from this brewery in the future. An underwhelming beer in the style.

C+

Serving type: bottle

01-13-2013 04:38:59 | More by kojevergas
Photo of sbanacho
sbanacho

California

3.5/5  rDev -7.9%

01-11-2013 05:38:00 | More by sbanacho
Photo of mactrail
mactrail

California

3.78/5  rDev -0.5%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Very much in the middle of the Red/Amber field, with a dark coppery color and a raft of roam. Plenty of lacing and nicely carbonated in the mouth. Fairly light body.

The best feature is the slightly sweet and nutty flavor that greets the lips, gradually to be replaced by flowery hops. In a blind taste I'd peg this as a Pale Ale. Slight roasted flavor and some resiny hop hints. Moderate bitter aftertaste.

What I like about this is it's full of flavor but not overdone. The hops are flowery and spicy rather than acidic and harsh. The rather watery mouthfeel is an invitation to drink! From the 16 oz can purchased at Bine & Vine in San Diego.

Serving type: can

12-12-2012 03:30:02 | More by mactrail
Photo of drewone
drewone

California

4/5  rDev +5.3%

11-21-2012 06:50:13 | More by drewone
Photo of UCLABrewN84
UCLABrewN84

California

3.88/5  rDev +2.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

Pours a clear dark copper with a foamy khaki head that settles to a film on top of the beer. Foamy patches and streaks of lace form around the glass on the drink down. Smell is of malt and some earthy and herbal hop aromas. Taste is much the same with a peppery flavor on the finish. There is a mild hop bitterness on the palate with each sip. This beer has a good level of carbonation with a crisp mouthfeel. Overall, this is a good beer that is tasty and has some nice hop flavors.

Serving type: can

11-19-2012 00:56:20 | More by UCLABrewN84
Photo of flexabull
flexabull

California

3.95/5  rDev +3.9%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 4

Was pleasantly surprised to see this at a local grocery store. Have heard good things about this brewery.

Pours a clear and bubbly dark amber color with a fine white head.

Aromas are nice. Notes of hard candies, sweet citrus, and a touch of pine resin.

Taste is a bit unique. Notes of hard candies, strong caramel flavors, but not overly sweet. Finish is very earthy and slightly bitter.

Mouthfeel is smooth, but a touch thin.

Overall, a very nice amber ale, and a beer that is ultimately better than the sum of it's parts. I think with a bit more body this could be really good. Nice first beer from Ruhstaller, I'll be on the lookout for more of their offerings.

Serving type: bottle

10-29-2012 03:09:20 | More by flexabull
Photo of GRG1313
GRG1313

California

4/5  rDev +5.3%

10-16-2012 04:37:57 | More by GRG1313
Photo of prisdefer
prisdefer

New York

3/5  rDev -21.1%

07-30-2012 23:11:30 | More by prisdefer
Photo of jlt6116
jlt6116

California

3.75/5  rDev -1.3%

07-04-2012 17:57:11 | More by jlt6116
Photo of ttttrrrrtttt
ttttrrrrtttt

California

3.25/5  rDev -14.5%

06-14-2012 19:00:24 | More by ttttrrrrtttt
« first ‹ prev | 1-25 | 26-50  | next › last »
1881 from Ruhstaller
85 out of 100 based on 33 user ratings.