Log in or Sign up
Ridgeback Ale
- No Label Brewing Company
Displayed for educational use only; do not reuse.
Tweet
BA SCORE
84
good
-
53 Ratings
THE BROS
N/A
-
send 'em beer »
rAvg: 3.71
pDev: 12.13%
Reviews: 7
Hads: 46
Ratings Help
Brewed by:
No Label Brewing Company
Texas
,
United States
Style | ABV
American Amber / Red Ale
| 6.10%
ABV
Availability:
Year-round.
bottle (4)
,
on-tap (2)
,
growler (1)
.
Notes:
No notes at this time.
View:
Beers
(8) |
Events
(0)
Reviews
Sort by:
Latest
|
High
|
Low
|
Top Reviewers
| Show Hads:
« first ‹ prev
|
1-25
|
26-50
|
51-75
|
next ›
last »
Reviews by JMad:
JMad
Texas
4.13
/5
rDev
+11.3%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4.5 | feel: 4 | overall: 4
The beer pours a very dark brown color with a red tint, the head is tan with loose bubbles. It has a strong sweet toffee smell with a hint of chocolate. Tastes very good, I detected some dark chocolate with caramel and bread with a hint of bitterness from the hops. It has a medium body with moderate carbonation and a dry finish. This is a very nice amber I could drink this a lot more.
Serving type: bottle
11-03-2012 01:12:48 |
More by JMad
More User Reviews:
tvl89
Texas
4
/5
rDev
+7.8%
05-01-2013 04:32:59 |
More by tvl89
Bearman13
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
04-29-2013 04:05:34 |
More by Bearman13
whispernmyghost
Texas
5
/5
rDev
+34.8%
04-19-2013 23:23:23 |
More by whispernmyghost
pgfault
Texas
3.03
/5
rDev
-18.3%
look: 4 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 3 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3
Poured from tap with minimal head, which diminished quickly. Not much lacing on the glass. Very dark amber in color, not quite opaque. Despite its color, the nose just isn't there. There's a faint hop aroma, not many malt notes. Initial taste is crisp with a slightly hoppy bitterness. As with the aroma, I was expecting a complex malt profile, given the dark color, but couldn't find it. The finish was lightly bitter. It's flavors come out a bit more as it warms.
Despite having a deceptive flavor profile, it's still quite drinkable as is... certainly drinkable in the Texas summer.
Serving type: on-tap
04-17-2013 00:01:54 |
More by pgfault
t0rin0
California
3.25
/5
rDev
-12.4%
03-31-2013 01:07:58 |
More by t0rin0
jbdaves72
Texas
4
/5
rDev
+7.8%
03-26-2013 03:13:33 |
More by jbdaves72
SmellsofMahagony
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
03-25-2013 03:30:46 |
More by SmellsofMahagony
Michaeldmanley
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
03-24-2013 02:34:17 |
More by Michaeldmanley
mcdsports
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
03-17-2013 02:00:44 |
More by mcdsports
Pesci
Texas
4
/5
rDev
+7.8%
03-15-2013 21:34:07 |
More by Pesci
vcoggins
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
03-07-2013 03:52:07 |
More by vcoggins
Ted
Texas
3.75
/5
rDev
+1.1%
03-04-2013 00:14:39 |
More by Ted
coloslc
Texas
4
/5
rDev
+7.8%
02-24-2013 04:05:35 |
More by coloslc
gtermi
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
02-19-2013 01:13:22 |
More by gtermi
afluentturtle
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
02-02-2013 00:05:43 |
More by afluentturtle
phishbone23
New York
3.75
/5
rDev
+1.1%
01-25-2013 14:07:49 |
More by phishbone23
abex44
Texas
3.25
/5
rDev
-12.4%
01-22-2013 02:45:00 |
More by abex44
Ford
Texas
3
/5
rDev
-19.1%
01-18-2013 00:23:19 |
More by Ford
hsus0225
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
01-13-2013 05:24:46 |
More by hsus0225
tswater
Colorado
3.75
/5
rDev
+1.1%
01-08-2013 19:40:20 |
More by tswater
ranger7
Texas
2.75
/5
rDev
-25.9%
01-07-2013 00:41:40 |
More by ranger7
KKB
Massachusetts
3.48
/5
rDev
-6.2%
look: 3 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5
A – A medium brown-rouge color that is translucent with a very small top of beige-white head and very little carbonation flowing up from the bottom. It doesn’t look awesome but lets see what she smells like.
S – The aroma is just a smack of toffee, butterscotch, burnt wheat toast and perhaps a hint of vanilla and dark fruit. Really the most prominent smell though is the burnt toast aspect with the surrounding flavors just serving as sweetening elements. I’m not sure how I feel about this smell, it’s kind of turning me off, but I am intrigued—it is unique.
T – The flavor is definitely an improvement upon the aroma, but only in the intensity with which the flavors are at. The flavor is much sweeter than the aroma with the toffee/butterscotch playing a far bigger role, but the burnt toast that was first noticed in the aroma is still very much present in the taste. It’s not wholly unpleasant, but I wouldn’t call it great either. It definitely has a bit of vanilla element to it and I can see where I thought up the dark fruit in the aroma as there is just a hint of it in here. Malt is definitely the star though…As it warms the flavors come together more congruently and it begins to taste rather good actually.
M – Mouthfeel is medium, moderate carbonation, not overly smooth or silky but it is kind of nice.
O – I do not love this beer. I think that it works, and for a while I was actually feeling it, but at the end of the day I don’t love the smell or the flavor. I don’t really recommend it.
Serving type: bottle
01-02-2013 05:14:47 |
More by KKB
awalsh
Texas
4
/5
rDev
+7.8%
12-29-2012 17:46:48 |
More by awalsh
cdwil
Texas
3.5
/5
rDev
-5.7%
12-11-2012 13:59:24 |
More by cdwil
« first ‹ prev
|
1-25
|
26-50
|
51-75
|
next ›
last »
Ridgeback Ale from No Label Brewing Company
84
out of
100
based on
53
user ratings.
Home
Forums
Beers
Add Beer
Top 250 Beers
Beer Styles
Beer 101
Respect Beer
Places
Events
Magazine
Log in
Beer
Place
Event
Forum