CuDA Cascadian Dark Ale - Natian Brewery

tone77

Pennsylvania

3.46/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 4 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

This beer comes from the creator of the canquest, woodychandler. Poured from a 16 oz. can. Has a black color with a 1 inch head. Smell is of roasted malts, a hint of sweetness. Taste is hops, bitter, some malts, decent flavor. Have some water around, because this is one dry beer, I'm talking camel safari in the sahara dry. Feels medium bodied in the mouth and overall is a decent beer.

Serving type: can

02-22-2013 06:43:55 | More by tone77

woodychandler

Pennsylvania

3.46/5  rDev +6.1%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3 | overall: 3.5

I am CANfounded by this one! I know that msubulldog25 sent me some CANs as I passed one onto my local, in-person trader, tone77 but I scored this CAN at the Friendly Greek a few days ago. Did a review disappear into the ether? Has The CANQuest (TM) finally addled my mind to the point that I CANnot keep track? I dunno, but it is just a wee tad disCANcerting!

From the CAN: "Pint In A C[AN]"; "Cascadian Dark Ale"; "CuDA [-] A savory interplay of resinous hops that bring a piney, spicy flavor and hints of roast to this medium bodied, almost black ale [that] is similar to a srong versioned Ameri[CAN] IPA."; "na-tian [ney-sheh n] - Noun 1. We Brew Beer. That's About As Definitive As It Needs To Get".

Having forgotten what I have already learned, my Crack splashed my knuckle with a few drops of beer that simply could not be CANtained by their surrounding medium. This beer was not as active as their Blonde, but my inverted Glug still required that I back off lest I get glass overflow. I gauged it at a finger-of-a-half of dense, rocky, deep-tan head with decent retention. Color was, well, dark. Say, who turned the lights out?!? It was a deep, dark-brown allowing for light penetration only at the edges. Time once again for Bro. Woody's soapbox: Who came up with this style?!? It is the beer equivalent of Florence and Normandie in LA in 1992 - the worst intersection imaginable. I like hops and the roasty malts only get in the way of my enjoyment. For stout and porter fans, the hops get in the way of their malts. It is like the opposite of a Reese's Peanut Butter Cup in that "Hey, you got your roasty malts in my IPA and they DON'T taste good together!" Nose had a piney, minty hoppiness tempered (ruined?) by the additional presence of a chocolaty, smoky roastiness. Grr. Mouthfeel was (generously) medium-bodied, closer to thin, but not enough so as to be called watery. The taste had that unusual melding of minty hops tempered by deeply roasted malts and my CANdy reference was misplaced - this was more like a York Peppermint Patty, but I am not a big fan of them, either. The finish was more minty than roasty, but I still felt like I was grasping to get as much enjoyment out of it as I could. I should also mention the sticky lacing that formed as I drank through this beer. Impressive, but kind of dark for my taste.

Serving type: can

06-16-2013 17:08:16 | More by woodychandler

flagmantho

Washington

3.69/5  rDev +13.2%
look: 4 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.5

Poured from 16oz tall can into a pint glass.

Appearance: dark brown hue with plenty of haze. Head poured four or five inconvenient fingers of frothy dark-tan foam, despite being nicely chilled and a relatively gentle pour. Head has a pretty strong tenacity, so that's good for the look (although annoying).

Smell: lightly roasty malt aroma with a little hint of smokiness, it seems. Hops are woody, piney, resiney; the combination kind of works for me.

Taste: some light roasty character combined with some dark fruit undertones; the hops are quite subdued for the style but I think this works. The sweetness, which is high, is supported by the fruity notes and is cut by the moderate hop bitterness and somewhat citrusy hop flavor. This is a weird one -- but I kind of like it.

Mouthfeel: despite releasing plenty of carbonation during the pour, there is plenty left to bring lots of creaminess to this beer's medium body. Good stuff.

Overall: this beer is a little big piquant to be highly drinkable, but in general I find it to be an interesting beer with some unexpected complexities.

Serving type: can

06-10-2013 18:48:27 | More by flagmantho

BESTIALEX

Oregon

3.25/5  rDev -0.3%

04-04-2013 02:44:13 | More by BESTIALEX

bluckbeyes

Oregon

3.75/5  rDev +15%

03-16-2013 06:02:34 | More by bluckbeyes

johnnyboy76

Oregon

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%

01-26-2013 17:56:21 | More by johnnyboy76

craigreno

Oregon

2.75/5  rDev -15.6%

12-15-2012 01:31:47 | More by craigreno

tempest

Pennsylvania

2.2/5  rDev -32.5%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2 | overall: 2

Picked up a can at Belmont Station. Sorry Natian, this tastes like you've got an infection. The overzealous head was the first sign, but then the rubbery and plastic phenols. I can tell there are tasty, biting citrus hops hidden under the undesirables, along with toasted, roasty cocoa malts. But this one's a drain pour. What a shame, I bet it was delicious fresh out of the fermenter.

Serving type: can

10-10-2012 02:45:48 | More by tempest

DefenCorps

Oregon

2.25/5  rDev -31%
look: 4 | smell: 2.5 | taste: 2 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 2

16 oz can from Whole Foods in Tanasbourne for $3.50 or so.

A very dark brown capped with a large, dense, brown head with good retention and moderate lacing. The nose is disappointing. Metallic (stressed yeast? poor water?) notes are most noticeable, along with a mild hoppiness and pleasant roast. Hoppiness is pine-like but underwhelming. The roast character is mild too.

The palate opens with a harsh roasted grain acidity followed by a metallic mid-palate. An oily pine hop bitterness is present, but paradoxically, this also does feel a little watery, especially towards the finish. The malt profile here is confused, with roast but no chocolate/caramel sweetness to temper it, and clashing with the hop profile. Medium-light in body and moderately carbonated, this beer has a metallic, acidic and bitter finish that's disappointing. Mediocre.

Serving type: can

09-17-2012 03:21:03 | More by DefenCorps

Reidrover

Oregon

4/5  rDev +22.7%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4 | feel: 4 | overall: 4

16 oz can from "Lifesource" Salem. $2.99 Darkest brown not quite dark with a big thick and creamy tan head. Mostly toasty malt aromas but also getting some piney hop notes. Very roasty/toasty malt taste, hops are overwhelmed and slightly grassy. Creamy burnt oats also. I like it . Nice creamy well constructed mouthfeel. WEll i thought this was an excellent beer and really enjoyed it, but for me this is a good strong porter wit a little hops. Stretching the Cascadian Dark Ale label a bit methinks. But still tasty

Serving type: can

09-03-2012 21:59:14 | More by Reidrover

jdense

Oregon

3.5/5  rDev +7.4%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3.5

Nanofest PDX 8.27.11.

Clear dark brown body, a little bit of visible carbonation, not much lacing. Nose is roast forward, some citrus and caramel. Taste is roasty, wee bit of chocolate, got more bitter on back end as it warmed, piney, balanced citrus sweetness. Mouthfeel in on the light side of medium, a bit sticky. OK, better than some CDAs, but a long way's from the pantheon of this emerging style, too malty, not enough hops.

Serving type: bottle

08-29-2011 18:32:42 | More by jdense