-
Stop lurking! Log in to search, post in our forums, review beers, see fewer ads, and more. — Todd, Founder of BeerAdvocate
Biere De Mars
New Belgium Brewing Company
- From:
- New Belgium Brewing Company
- Colorado, United States
- Style:
- Bière de Garde
- ABV:
- 6.2%
- Score:
- 83
- Avg:
- 3.65 | pDev: 13.42%
- Reviews:
- 412
- Ratings:
- Status:
- Retired
- Rated:
- Jun 07, 2023
- Added:
- Jul 20, 2009
- Wants:
- 47
- Gots:
- 43
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Ratings by chOAKbarrell:
Reviewed by chOAKbarrell from Maryland
3.28/5 rDev -10.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
3.28/5 rDev -10.1%
look: 3.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 3.5 | overall: 3
Nice looking bottle with the brewery's name embossed on a ring around the neck. The beer itself is a cloudy orange creamsicle with a fluffy very white head.
Kind of a subdued citrusy wheaty nose, yet not really like a wheat beer, hefeweizen, or whitbier. A bit of a funky stink going on. Interesting.
Taste is kind of the same as the smell. Seems familiar, yet it is still different. On the hearty side, I would say. I'm having a tough time describing this one.
The mouthfeel is on the fuller side.
Dont really know what to say about this one. Its not like any other beer I've had, but that's not necessarily a good thing. I'm not particularly impressed or disappointed. I dont like or dislike it.
Mar 07, 2006Kind of a subdued citrusy wheaty nose, yet not really like a wheat beer, hefeweizen, or whitbier. A bit of a funky stink going on. Interesting.
Taste is kind of the same as the smell. Seems familiar, yet it is still different. On the hearty side, I would say. I'm having a tough time describing this one.
The mouthfeel is on the fuller side.
Dont really know what to say about this one. Its not like any other beer I've had, but that's not necessarily a good thing. I'm not particularly impressed or disappointed. I dont like or dislike it.
More User Ratings:
Reviewed by stevoj from Idaho
3.25/5 rDev -11%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
3.25/5 rDev -11%
look: 3.25 | smell: 3.25 | taste: 3.25 | feel: 3.25 | overall: 3.25
Bottle at share. Deep golden orange pour with thin white head. Light malty aroma, slight tanginess, slight sourness, pit fruit, orange peel. Nice consstency and feel.
Jun 07, 2023Reviewed by macrosmatic from Florida
3.78/5 rDev +3.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75
3.78/5 rDev +3.6%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3.75 | taste: 3.75 | feel: 4 | overall: 3.75
Thanks to dogdoc for sending me this bottle, back in the day. Reviewed from (long-standing) notes. A 22 oz. 2012 vintage bottle, that somehow got put away in the cellar until 2/1/18; whereupon it was opened and poured into a J. Wakefield OG club teku glass.
A: Pours a mildly hazy gold, with a sizeable, two-finger off-white head with decent retention. A remarkably good bit of visible carbonation for being approximately six years old.
S: Lemon citrus, pineapple forward Brettanomyces with some barnyard funk. Cracker malts, and a mild (but present) oxidative caramel aroma. Mild lactic tart with the lemony citric acid.
T: Funky Brett, pineapple and barnyard and musty. Citric acid, lemons, milder lactic tart. Cracker malts, a bit yeasty with accompanying esters. A bit more oxidation on the palate than the nose suggested – comes across as some caramel in the malts (I’m assuming it didn’t start that way), with just a touch of the cardboard. A minerally hard water profile. But then more tart and funk near the swallow, and finishes with more dry Brett funk.
M: A fairly light body but not watery. Low alcohol presence, and a good amount of carbonation sensation.
O: Never overly tart, but definitely a player here. The funk has grown, and I like it. I remain uncertain that the increase in funk (which was nice) is worth the trade off with the oxidation though. But still a good dry citric acid tartness. Pretty decent, not great.
Mar 29, 2020A: Pours a mildly hazy gold, with a sizeable, two-finger off-white head with decent retention. A remarkably good bit of visible carbonation for being approximately six years old.
S: Lemon citrus, pineapple forward Brettanomyces with some barnyard funk. Cracker malts, and a mild (but present) oxidative caramel aroma. Mild lactic tart with the lemony citric acid.
T: Funky Brett, pineapple and barnyard and musty. Citric acid, lemons, milder lactic tart. Cracker malts, a bit yeasty with accompanying esters. A bit more oxidation on the palate than the nose suggested – comes across as some caramel in the malts (I’m assuming it didn’t start that way), with just a touch of the cardboard. A minerally hard water profile. But then more tart and funk near the swallow, and finishes with more dry Brett funk.
M: A fairly light body but not watery. Low alcohol presence, and a good amount of carbonation sensation.
O: Never overly tart, but definitely a player here. The funk has grown, and I like it. I remain uncertain that the increase in funk (which was nice) is worth the trade off with the oxidation though. But still a good dry citric acid tartness. Pretty decent, not great.
Reviewed by Jason from Massachusetts
3.62/5 rDev -0.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.5
3.62/5 rDev -0.8%
look: 4.25 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 3.5 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 3.5
22oz brown bottle, sample sent from brewery.
Massive rocky head, clear copper hue. Green peppercorn, quince, wild flowers, & white tea in the nose. Very crisp and dry. Dry cracker-like malt, yeast and spice are predominant. Faintly medicinal, wild herbs, taffy, lavender, & more nutty yeast on the palate. A pretty good sip, seems it would be better with food than on its own.
Apr 16, 2016Massive rocky head, clear copper hue. Green peppercorn, quince, wild flowers, & white tea in the nose. Very crisp and dry. Dry cracker-like malt, yeast and spice are predominant. Faintly medicinal, wild herbs, taffy, lavender, & more nutty yeast on the palate. A pretty good sip, seems it would be better with food than on its own.
Reviewed by rodbeermunch from Nevada
3.05/5 rDev -16.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
3.05/5 rDev -16.4%
look: 3.75 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 3 | overall: 3
Light auburn and dark yellow color, solid Brussels lace on the side, good retention before that. Aroma was complex with yeast contributions of pepper, wheat, citrus rind.
Bready mouthfeel. Some spice rack. Coriander and clove, not huge. Too much bitterness for style.
Dec 22, 2015Bready mouthfeel. Some spice rack. Coriander and clove, not huge. Too much bitterness for style.
Reviewed by pat61 from Minnesota
4.18/5 rDev +14.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25
4.18/5 rDev +14.5%
look: 4 | smell: 4 | taste: 4.25 | feel: 4.25 | overall: 4.25
It has malty, bready aromas and fruit and spice flavors. Lemon flavors and aromas. It pours an orangey gold. The Brett yeast gives it a touch of sourness and light funk. Highly carbonated, medium light body.
Jun 26, 2015Rated by heytomcat from Minnesota
2.77/5 rDev -24.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75
2.77/5 rDev -24.1%
look: 3 | smell: 2.75 | taste: 2.75 | feel: 2.75 | overall: 2.75
Very carbonated. Not much flavor with a touch of Brett funk. Dry aftertaste
May 23, 2015
Biere De Mars from New Belgium Brewing Company
Beer rating:
83 out of
100 with
762 ratings
We love reviews (150 characters or more)! Check out: How to Review a Beer. You don't need to get fancy. Drop some thoughts on the beer's attributes (look, smell, taste, feel) plus your overall impression. Something that backs up your rating and helps others. Thanks!