Big Sound Scotch Ale - Rum Barrel Aged
Cigar City Brewing

Big Sound Scotch Ale - Rum Barrel AgedBig Sound Scotch Ale - Rum Barrel Aged
Beer Geek Stats | Print Shelf Talker
From:
Cigar City Brewing
 
Florida, United States
Style:
Scotch Ale / Wee Heavy
ABV:
8.5%
Score:
79
Avg:
3.4 | pDev: 24.71%
Ratings:
64 | reviews: 19
Status:
Retired
Rated:
Mar 15, 2016
Added:
Oct 13, 2011
Wants:
  14
Gots:
  13
No description / notes.
Recent ratings and reviews. | Log in to view more ratings + sorting options.
Ratings by Alieniloquium:
Photo of Alieniloquium
Reviewed by Alieniloquium from Florida

2.64/5  rDev -22.4%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3 | taste: 3 | feel: 2.5 | overall: 1
750 mL bottle poured into a snifter. Reviewed from notes. I should preface this review by saying that I was fully aware of the infection before opening. It's difficult to review to style, as I thought that it tasted quite interesting, but clearly not to the scotch ale style.

Appearance - Nice head. Deep mahogany. Good lacing. Looks great, really.

Smell - Apples. Slight tart acidity. Some cherry aromas. No rum and no malt. No barrel, either. If I'm honest, it doesn't smell bad at all, though.

Taste - Immediate tartness. Dry fruit of the apple persuasion. Tastes like an oud bruin. Dry bitterness and astringency with an odd finish.

Mouthfeel - Very dry and very light. High carbonation.

Overall - I find this to be drinkable. It's obviously not what was intended, but it has its merits. To style, it's awful. As a Flanders Red or an Oud Bruin, it could be passable. Not good, but passable.
Jul 05, 2012
More User Ratings:
 
Rated: 3.9 by M_chav from New Mexico

Mar 15, 2016
 
Rated: 3.92 by szmnnl99 from Michigan

Mar 07, 2016
 
Rated: 3.75 by olradetbalder from Sweden

Dec 02, 2014
 
Rated: 3.5 by DrBier from Pennsylvania

Jul 25, 2014
 
Rated: 3.5 by koopa from New Jersey

Jun 21, 2014
 
Rated: 4 by iL0VEbeer from New Jersey

Jun 16, 2014
 
Rated: 3.5 by moonknight31 from California

May 31, 2014
 
Rated: 3 by jarrgal from North Dakota

Apr 26, 2014
 
Rated: 3.5 by zestar from California

Oct 27, 2013
 
Rated: 5 by Justinlikesbeer from Florida

May 28, 2013
 
Rated: 4 by manutdfan from Florida

May 27, 2013
 
Rated: 3.25 by lionssoccer13 from Florida

Feb 26, 2013
 
Rated: 3.25 by spycow from Illinois

Jan 14, 2013
Photo of jmarsh123
Reviewed by jmarsh123 from Indiana

3.81/5  rDev +12.1%
look: 4.5 | smell: 3.5 | taste: 4 | feel: 3 | overall: 4
Been dreading opening this one after reading about the infection right when I was shipped the bottle. Glad I finally did.

Pours dark reddish brown with a bubbly tan head. Good retention and lace.

Aroma shows it's definitely infected, but it isn't overly acentone like. Smells like a kriek mostly with a nutty grainy caramel malt character.

Not too bad for an infection and not nearly as bad as some others I've had recently. Lots of nuttyness. Caramel/toffee with some fig character which IIRC all would come from the base beer. A nice tart cherry balances this out, but isn't overpowering. Actually a pretty good addition. Rum peaks in at the end to add a bit of a burn with some oak.

Infection definitely dried out this beer more than probably intended, but ok with me since I like dry beers. Fortunately even though it's not perfect mouthfeel the infection didn't thin it out too much or cause overcarbing.

Glad I sat on this for a while as it appears to be rounding into something drinkable if not intended. We all rather enjoyed this and if you just told me it was a dark sour, I wouldn't have batted an eye. A few issues due to the infection, but I've had many non-infected beers be much worse than this.
Nov 27, 2012
 
Rated: 4.75 by Brewseph from California

Nov 12, 2012
 
Rated: 3.25 by beernads from Florida

Sep 15, 2012
 
Rated: 2.75 by t0rin0 from California

Sep 10, 2012
 
Rated: 3.5 by Chico1985 from Massachusetts

Aug 15, 2012
 
Rated: 3.5 by Yallnumbskulls from Massachusetts

Aug 12, 2012